The Rule of 3

Ok it's not a rule, more of a guideline, but it goes something like this: once is an accident, twice is coincidence, thrice is a pattern.

So if you are walking down the street and a snowball beans you in the noggin, you look around, see nothing, and keep walking. If a second snowball hits you, you stop and look around more carefully. You start walking, warily, because you think it will probably happen again. When the third snowball arrives, you know someone is targeting you, and it's time to take evasive action or find ammunition of your own.

I got this concept from a writing class. It's used all the time in writing. My teacher called it the try-fail:

(1) hero tries something, fails;
(2) hero tries again, a bit differently this time, fails again;
(3) hero tries again, succeeds.

This is a simple and easy way of creating tension.

When the hero tries the first time, there is no tension, so he must fail. When he fails the second time, we have now established a pattern. When he tries the third time, the reader expects him to fail again, but no! He succeeds! Surprise! Wow, what an ending.

As examples:

- Goldilocks tried two lumpy beds before she found one she liked.
- The wolf blew down two little piggies' houses before finding one that could stand against him.
- Luke Skywalker faced Darth Vader twice and lost (once in the cave on Dagobah, once in Bespin) before he finally defeated him.

In class we did an exercise where we had to create a story with the try-fail, and it was really easy.

Naturally this technique has been done enough times that people know what is coming by the third try, but still, it works. If your story is lacking in tension, throw in a try-fail or two and see what happens.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re:The Rule of 3

Thanks for that piece, Eddy.

It's a good system that I revert to sometimes when I am stuck, but I don't follow the system religiously. I find that suspense, surprise, and appealing characters are better than formula at keeping reader's eyes from straying from the page. (Truly great writers can forget about plot altogether and keep a reader riveted just with their wry and eloquent observations about the human condition.) Indeed, the character must always come first, because without a sympathetic character, the reader will not care whether or not he or she succeeds.

Following the Rule of 3s runs the risk of imposing the plot upon the characters, and I prefer to drop my characters into a particular situation and let them create the plot as they struggle to cope. Occasionally, I'll poke them in the back to move them in a direction I want. Once my characters take on life, they often take my stories in surprising directions, and I have the great pleasure of becoming more reader than author.

The Rule of 3s is a great system to teach to new writers, as it gets them thinking about conflict and plot, but eventually writers will move beyond it to find their own techniques and voice.

To err is human. I am not human.